The Business Value of Watch Collaborations: What Swatch, Omega, Blancpain, and the Royal Oak Teach Us About Creating New Market Demand

In March 2022, long queues formed outside a small number of Swatch boutiques in cities such as New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Zurich. People were waiting, sometimes for hours, to buy a plastic-and-ceramic wristwatch called the MoonSwatch — a joint creation of Swatch and Omega, two brands that both belong to the Swatch Group. Within the first year, more than one million units were sold, far above the company's initial forecast, and management later noted that interest in the original Omega Speedmaster rose sharply in parallel. A year and a half later, in September 2023, Swatch repeated the idea with Blancpain, releasing an affordable, mechanical interpretation of the legendary Fifty Fathoms dive watch. Both launches turned an ordinary retail moment into a widely discussed cultural and economic event.

These two cases invite a larger question that is useful for teaching and for management practice. What is the real #business_value of a watch #collaboration, and how does a partnership actually generate #new_market_demand rather than simply moving sales from one product to another? To explore this question in a concrete way, this article uses a simple educational thought experiment. It imagines how the logic behind the MoonSwatch and the Blancpain project might apply to an icon from a different corner of the industry — the Royal Oak, the flagship design of Audemars Piguet. It is important to be clear from the start that no such Royal Oak or Audemars Piguet collaboration with Swatch has been announced, and that Audemars Piguet is an independent company rather than part of the Swatch Group. The scenario is used only as an analytical lens, not as a prediction or a recommendation.

The aim of the article is neutral and academic. It does not promote any brand, nor does it criticise any company or manager. Instead, it treats the watch industry as a rich classroom for understanding several linked ideas: #co_branding, the making of accessible luxury (often called #masstige), the psychology of #scarcity, the power of #storytelling, and the role of the #secondary_market. The deeper purpose is to draw out lessons that students, educators, and responsible managers can use to build a better and fairer future for #brand_collaboration. The article is organised into five parts: a theoretical background, an analysis of the real and hypothetical cases, a balanced discussion of benefits and risks, and a short conclusion.

Theoretical Background

To understand why a watch collaboration can create demand, it helps to gather a small set of well-studied concepts from marketing and consumer research. Each concept has been examined in recent peer-reviewed work, and together they form a practical toolkit.

The first idea is #co_branding, which describes two or more brands joining their names, meanings, and reputations in a single product. Research suggests that co-branding is not a simple sum of two logos; it can create value greater than the parts when the partners fit well together. In a widely cited study, Shan, Lu, and Cui (2022) asked whether "one plus one can be greater than two" and found that co-branding can lift a brand's #masstige, meaning its blend of mass appeal and prestige, especially when consumers perceive a good fit between the partners. Quamina, Xue, and Chawdhary (2023) extended this thinking to luxury brands and reported that partnerships with more accessible brands do not automatically damage the luxury partner. In many conditions the collaboration can spread positive associations, which challenges the older fear that any downward reach must dilute a prestige name.

The second idea is #luxury_democratization, the process by which goods once reserved for a small elite become available to a much wider public. Shukla, Rosendo-Rios, and Khalifa (2022) offered a unified way to think about this concept and showed that democratization changes how value perceptions translate into purchase intention. In related work, Shukla and colleagues (2022) analysed several countries and found that the effects of democratization vary with market context, while Rosendo-Rios and Shukla (2023) noted that greater accessibility can also change the feelings of long-standing luxury buyers. The masstige literature adds useful nuance here. Pizzetti, Chereau, Soscia, and Teng (2023) compared French and Chinese consumers and found that attitudes toward accessible-luxury strategies differ by culture and by the exact form the strategy takes, such as a sub-brand versus an added product line. Alić, Činjarević, and Maktouf-Kahriman (2022) and Al-Issa, Kwiatek, and Dens (2024) further described who masstige buyers are and what they value, pointing to a large and growing middle segment that wants a credible taste of prestige at a reachable price.

The third idea is #scarcity, one of the most studied levers in marketing. The core intuition is old: when something feels limited, people often judge it to be more valuable and more desirable. Recent evidence gives this intuition a careful shape. In a large meta-analysis, Barton, Zlatevska, and Oppewal (2022) synthesised many studies and confirmed that scarcity cues generally raise #perceived_value and #purchase_intention, while also showing that the size of the effect depends on the type of scarcity and the product. A second meta-analysis by Ladeira and colleagues (2023) reached a similar conclusion, noting that context matters a great deal and that the effect is not automatic. Song, Choi, and Moon (2021) distinguished between limited-time and limited-quantity messages and examined how the presence of other shoppers and a sense of competition change consumer responses. Taken together, this research treats scarcity as a real but conditional tool rather than a guaranteed trick.

The fourth idea is #storytelling. A collaboration usually carries a narrative — a shared history, a design heritage, or a mission that gives the product meaning beyond its function. Storytelling is especially important for younger buyers. Chiu and Ho (2023), studying Chinese #Gen_Z consumers, showed how communication and endorsement on social media shape purchase intention, and their findings point to the value of authentic, well-told brand narratives for a generation that verifies claims quickly and rewards genuine meaning. When a story links two respected names to a single object, it can turn a purchase into a small act of participation in something larger.

The final idea is the #secondary_market. Once a collaboration sells out, unsold demand does not disappear; it often moves to resale platforms, where prices reveal how strongly people want the object. Both the MoonSwatch and the Blancpain project appeared quickly on resale sites at multiples of their retail price, which sent a public signal about desirability. The wider pre-owned watch sector has grown into a substantial market in its own right, and it now acts as an important source of visibility, price discovery, and #brand_equity for many watchmakers.

It is worth adding one economic distinction that ties these ideas together. When we ask whether a collaboration is valuable, we are really asking whether it creates demand or merely moves it. Demand is simply relocated if the buyers of the new product would have spent the same money on the same brands anyway. Demand is genuinely created when the launch draws in people who were not previously part of the category, or when it raises the total attention and spending directed at watches as a whole. The masstige and democratization studies (Shukla, Rosendo-Rios, & Khalifa, 2022; Pizzetti et al., 2023) are useful here because they describe exactly this expansion of the market toward a broad middle segment. A second economic idea is #price_anchoring: an accessible product tied to a prestige design can shape what newcomers believe the "real" version is worth, and this anchoring can support, rather than replace, future full-price purchases. These two ideas — demand creation and price anchoring — help explain why a single, well-judged launch can behave like a small economic event rather than an isolated sale.

Analysis

With this toolkit in place, the mechanics of the real cases become clearer. The MoonSwatch combined three forces at once. First, it fused two reputations: the space-exploration heritage of the Omega Speedmaster and the playful, affordable identity of Swatch. This is #co_branding in its purest form, and the fit was strong because both names are genuinely iconic in their own segments. Second, it delivered a real novelty in the shape of bioceramic, a light, durable material that gave the object a distinct feel and a modern story. Third, and crucially, the launch used a tightly designed distribution plan. The watches were sold only in a limited number of physical stores, with a strict one-per-customer rule and no online option at first. This created intense #scarcity and, with it, the now-famous queues.

The economic outcome was notable in several ways. The direct result was more than a million units sold in the first year, which was well above forecasts. But the more interesting effect was indirect. Company leadership reported that the affordable homage lifted interest in the full-price Speedmaster, an example of a #halo_effect in which the accessible product acts as a doorway to the prestige product rather than a substitute for it. For many first-time buyers, the MoonSwatch was a first taste of the Omega world and a possible step toward a future full-price purchase. In this sense the collaboration did not only capture existing demand; it helped to create #new_market_demand by inviting new people into the category.

This "doorway" idea deserves a closer look, because it is the heart of the #business_value at stake. In marketing terms, the accessible collaboration can widen the top of the purchase funnel: it introduces a large group of people to a design and a story, and a portion of that group may, over years, move toward higher-priced products or become loyal advocates who spread the story further. A parent who owns a Speedmaster and gives a MoonSwatch to a child is passing on more than an object; they are passing on a relationship with a brand and a craft. The same logic underlies the growth of the pre-owned market, where visible resale demand keeps a design in public conversation and reassures future buyers that the object holds meaning and value. When these effects combine, the collaboration functions as an engine of long-term #brand_equity, not simply as a short-term sales spike.

The Blancpain × Swatch Scuba Fifty Fathoms of 2023 followed a similar logic but with two meaningful differences. It used Swatch's automated mechanical movement, giving buyers an accessible mechanical watch rather than a quartz one, and it carried a clear #storytelling theme around the five oceans and their protection, including straps made from recovered fishing nets. This added a #sustainability dimension that speaks directly to the values many younger consumers say they hold. The launch again relied on limited physical availability and a one-per-person rule, and again the watches appeared on the #secondary_market at higher prices. Because the underlying Fifty Fathoms is less globally famous than the Speedmaster, the frenzy was calmer, which itself is a useful lesson: the strength of a collaboration depends heavily on the recognisability and meaning of the icon it reinterprets.

Now consider the educational thought experiment. Imagine, purely for analysis, that the design language of the Royal Oak — one of the most recognisable shapes in modern watchmaking, created by Audemars Piguet — were interpreted in a similar accessible spirit. What might the concepts above predict? First, #brand_visibility would likely rise, because a respected high-end design would suddenly become a topic of everyday conversation far beyond its usual audience. Second, the project could attract younger customers, offering them an affordable way to appreciate a design they admire but cannot yet buy at its full price, which connects to the #luxury_democratization and #masstige findings. Third, if the object were genuinely well made and told an honest story, it could build a pipeline of future buyers and generate #secondary_market activity that keeps the design culturally alive. In economic terms, the launch could function less like a single transaction and more like a wider event that shifts attention, anchors price expectations, and expands the community of people who care about the brand.

It is essential, however, to state the conditions the research attaches to these predictions. The literature is clear that outcomes depend on #brand_fit, on real product quality, and on a credible narrative. Scarcity works only when the desire is real; storytelling works only when the story is honest; and democratization succeeds only when it respects both the new audience and the existing one. A hypothetical Royal Oak-inspired project would therefore not be a guaranteed success. It would be a carefully balanced act, and its value would rest on execution rather than on the famous name alone. This is why the scenario is treated here as a teaching device: it shows how general principles could apply, while reminding us that the same principles also set real limits.

Discussion

Weighing the evidence, the benefits of well-designed watch collaborations are substantial and worth stating plainly. They can raise #brand_visibility across new audiences, refresh a category that competes with smartphones and connected devices for the same wrist, and invite younger customers into a world of craftsmanship and heritage. They can democratise access to admired design without necessarily harming the prestige of the original, a point supported by Quamina and colleagues (2023), whose findings counter the assumption that reaching downward always dilutes a luxury image. They can also create healthy #secondary_market activity that signals desirability and sustains long-term #brand_equity. For the wider economy, a single launch can generate media coverage, retail traffic, and consumer excitement that spill over to other products and even to other brands in the same category.

Yet a balanced academic view must also hold the tensions in clear sight, not to criticise anyone, but to learn. The first tension is between excitement and access. When demand far exceeds supply, the very #scarcity that drives desire can also produce frustration, queues, and resale prices that place the object out of reach for the ordinary buyers it was meant to welcome. A supply chain analysis of the MoonSwatch noted exactly this challenge: an unexpectedly successful launch created a large backlog and a lively resale market, which management then had to manage carefully. The lesson is that scarcity is a tool to be handled with responsibility, because an experience designed to feel inclusive can accidentally feel exclusive.

A second tension concerns durability and value. Some observers in the watch community raised questions about the repairability and long-term serviceability of these accessible pieces. Whatever one's view on the specific products, the general point is important for the future: as sustainability rises on the agenda of younger buyers, collaborations that build in repairability, honest materials, and genuine environmental commitments — as the ocean theme of the Blancpain project attempted — are likely to earn deeper trust. Here the #storytelling must match reality, because Gen Z audiences, as Chiu and Ho (2023) suggest, tend to verify claims and reward authenticity while quickly discounting messages that feel hollow.

A third tension is the risk of over-reliance on a single formula. The masstige and democratization research reminds managers that repeated accessible reinterpretations can, over time, shift how loyal buyers feel about the parent brand (Rosendo-Rios & Shukla, 2023). Cultural differences matter too: Pizzetti and colleagues (2023) show that the same strategy can be received differently across markets. A method that works spectacularly once may bring smaller returns if it is copied too often or applied without attention to #brand_fit and context. This is not a reason to avoid collaboration; it is a reason to design each one thoughtfully.

From these tensions, several forward-looking lessons emerge that suit an educational purpose. For students of business, the central takeaway is elegant and durable: #scarcity, #storytelling, and #collaboration, when combined with genuine quality and fit, can turn an ordinary product launch into a wider economic event that creates new demand rather than merely relocating it. For future managers, the responsible version of this lesson adds three conditions. Access should be designed to feel fair, so that excitement does not curdle into resentment. Stories should be true, so that trust compounds over time. And products should be built to last and, where possible, to tread lightly, so that commercial success and social responsibility move together. A collaboration built on these principles does more than sell watches; it teaches a new generation to value design, heritage, and craftsmanship, and it does so in a way that can be inclusive and sustainable.

There is also a broader economic insight worth naming. A successful collaboration illustrates how value can be created through meaning and coordination, not only through cost and price. Two firms, by combining reputations and telling a shared story, can expand the total size of interest in a category — a positive-sum outcome that benefits customers, employees, retailers, and even competitors who ride the renewed wave of attention. Understanding this positive-sum potential, and using it responsibly, is perhaps the most useful thing the watch industry can teach the classroom.

For managers and students who want to translate these ideas into practice, a few practical guidelines follow directly from the research. Choose partners with real #brand_fit, because the evidence shows that perceived fit is a strong condition for success (Shan et al., 2022). Treat #scarcity as a signal of genuine value rather than an artificial barrier, and plan supply and access with enough care that eager customers are not left feeling excluded. Build the #storytelling around something true — a shared heritage, a real material innovation, or a sincere social mission — because authenticity is what younger audiences reward. Measure success with more than first-week sales; look also at new customer reach, the #halo_effect on the parent brand, and the long-term health of #brand_equity. Finally, remember that culture matters: what excites consumers in one market may be received differently in another (Pizzetti et al., 2023). These guidelines do not guarantee a hit, but they turn a risky bet into a disciplined, teachable process.

For educators specifically, the watch collaborations offer an unusually clear teaching case. They connect abstract theories — co-branding, masstige, scarcity, and storytelling — to a single, vivid sequence of events that students can picture easily. They also invite the kind of critical thinking that good education requires, because the same launch can be read as a marketing triumph, a supply-chain challenge, and a question about fairness and sustainability all at once. A classroom that studies these cases learns not only how demand is created, but how to weigh commercial success against responsibility, which is exactly the balance that future leaders will need.

Conclusion

The MoonSwatch and the Blancpain × Swatch Scuba Fifty Fathoms show that a watch can be far more than a device for telling time; it can be the centre of a shared economic and cultural moment. By combining a respected reputation with accessible excitement, by adding a real novelty, and by managing availability with care, these collaborations generated strong #new_market_demand and drew a new generation into an old craft. The educational thought experiment involving the Royal Oak and Audemars Piguet — offered here only as an analytical lens, since no such project exists — helps to show how the same principles of #co_branding, #masstige, #scarcity, #storytelling, and the #secondary_market might extend to other icons, always subject to the conditions of fit, quality, and honesty that the research underlines.

The lasting lesson is hopeful and constructive. Collaboration can create value for many parties at once when it is built on genuine meaning rather than on hype alone. #Scarcity should invite people in rather than shut them out; stories should be truthful; and products should respect both the planet and the buyer. If the next generation of managers learns to combine creativity with responsibility, then the humble example of two watch brands joining forces can point toward a wider and better future — one in which #brand_collaboration expands opportunity, deepens appreciation for craftsmanship, and turns a simple launch into a moment of shared, and fairly shared, excitement.

Hashtags: #WatchCollaborations #WatchIndustry #LuxuryMarketing #CoBranding #Masstige #ScarcityMarketing #BrandStrategy #ConsumerBehavior #BusinessEducation #MarketingCaseStudy #RoyalOak #Swatch #AudemarsPiguet #MoonSwatch #NewMarketDemand #Business_Value_of_Watch_Collaborations · #Creating_New_Market_Demand · #Watch_Brand_Partnerships · #Learning_From_Brand_Collaborations · #Luxury_And_Accessibility

References

• Alić, A., Činjarević, M., & Maktouf-Kahriman, N. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of masstige purchase behaviour among different generations. Management & Marketing, 17(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0014

• Al-Issa, N., Kwiatek, P., & Dens, N. (2024). Masstige buyers: Profile, perceived luxury values and purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), e13005. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13005

• Barton, B. L., Zlatevska, N., & Oppewal, H. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003

• Chiu, C. L., & Ho, H.-C. (2023). Impact of celebrity, micro-celebrity, and virtual influencers on Chinese Gen Z's purchase intention through social media. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231164034

• Ladeira, W. J., et al. (2023). A meta-analysis on the effects of product scarcity. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21816

• Pizzetti, M., Chereau, P., Soscia, I., & Teng, F. (2023). Attitudes and intentions toward masstige strategies: A cross-cultural study of French and Chinese consumers. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114174

• Quamina, L. T., Xue, M. T., & Chawdhary, R. (2023). 'Co-branding as a masstige strategy for luxury brands: Desirable or not?' Journal of Business Research, 158, 113704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113704

• Rosendo-Rios, V., & Shukla, P. (2023). When luxury democratizes: Exploring the effects of luxury democratization, hedonic value, and instrumental self-presentation on traditional luxury consumers' behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113448

• Shan, J., Lu, H., & Cui, A. P. (2022). 1 + 1 > 2? Is co-branding an effective way to improve brand masstige? Journal of Business Research, 144, 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.058

• Shukla, P., Rosendo-Rios, V., & Khalifa, D. (2022). Is luxury democratization impactful? Its moderating effect between value perceptions and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 139, 782–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.030

• Shukla, P., Rosendo-Rios, V., Trott, S., Lyu, J. (Daisy), & Khalifa, D. (2022). Managing the challenge of luxury democratization: A multicountry analysis. Journal of International Marketing, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X221126925

• Song, M., Choi, S., & Moon, J. (2021). Limited time or limited quantity? The impact of other consumer existence and perceived competition on the scarcity messaging–purchase intention relation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.03.012